Oregon wood product industry a shadow of former self, but still huge in rural areas
By Brian Rooney
lumber-logs.jpg
Once Oregon’s largest manufacturing industry, employment in the wood product manufacturing industry has gone through large, well-publicized losses since the early 1990s, with its employment dropping below computer and electronic manufacturing and food manufacturing. Despite the losses, wood product manufacturing is still a large industry in Oregon and is especially important to rural areas of the state.
 
Employment Trends
 
Between 1990 and 2018, annual average employment in wood product manufacturing dropped 22,600, or 46 percent. Similar losses were experienced in all subsectors, with sawmills and wood preservation dropping 5,500 (46%); plywood and engineered wood products dropping 8,800 (49%); and all other wood product manufacturing, which includes millwork and prefabricated buildings, dropping 8,200 (51%).
 
Although the industry has been in decline over the long term, it trended upward for a short period during a national housing boom between 2003 and 2005. During that period, the industry increased from an annual average of 31,100 jobs to 32,700, an increase of 1,600, or 5.1 percent.
 
Then the Great Recession hit the industry hard. The overall wood product manufacturing industry dropped 13,500 (41%) between 2005 and 2011. Since then, the industry has been slow to rebound, adding 4,300 jobs, or 22 percent, between 2011 and 2018. As of the writing of this article, estimates show that wood product manufacturing continues its slow rebound, reaching 23,800 jobs as of June 2019.
 
Low demand from U.S. single-family home construction coming out of the recession is one reason for the slowness of the rebound. The prerecession peak of roughly 1.7 million units in 2005 dropped to a low of 430,000 in 2011. Single-family starts have recently recovered to 876,000 in 2018, causing some increase in demand for wood products.
 
Smaller Harvest, Technology, and Economies of Scale Contribute to Decline
 
Several structural shifts in the wood products industry have contributed to the employment decline. First, there was a drop in timber harvests from environmental concerns in the early 1990s. As harvest from federal lands reduced the amount of available raw material to mills, employment dropped, indicating that harvest reductions were a cause for the employment loss in the early 1990s.
 
New technologies brought another structural change to the industry by making lumber mills less labor intensive. Employment continued to drop even after harvest levels stabilized in the late 1990s and employment did not increase much despite a housing construction boom in the mid-2000s. Jobs in wood product manufacturing per million board feet harvested dropped steadily after 2000, likely due to technology.
 
In addition to new technologies, smaller mills were shuttered, creating efficiency through economies of scale (larger mills can produce more per worker). The average production of sawmills operating in the western U.S. increased as smaller mills were shuttered and efficiency increased through economies of scale and new technology.
 
Lumber production per worker in Oregon is another way to look at efficiency gains. It increased rapidly in the early 2000s, going from 806,000 board feet per worker in 2000 to 1.1 million in 2005. It then dropped back to 791,000 board feet during the Great Recession. It’s likely that mills cut production through fewer hours instead of letting go of workers during the recession. After the recession, production per worker increased to the elevated levels it had reached before the recession, reaching roughly 1.2 million board feet in 2017. Although the data has some error range, it appears that large efficiency gains were realized early in the 2000s and may have slowed recently.
 
Wood Products Are Still Important in Oregon, Especially in Rural Areas
 
Even with the decline, wood product manufacturing is still a large industry in Oregon. In 2018, there were 23,500 people employed and roughly $1.2 billion in total payroll in wood product manufacturing. While statewide the industry makes up only 1.2 percent of total employment and 1.2 percent of total payroll, the concentration is much higher in some counties, especially rural ones. For instance, in Douglas County 8.3 percent of total employment and 10.7 percent of total payroll was in wood product manufacturing. Most of the counties with a high concentration of employment in wood product manufacturing are rural.
 
In counties where the percent of total payroll exceeds the percent of total employment, average wages are higher in wood product manufacturing than the overall average wage. This is the case in most of the rural counties listed; indicating that wood product manufacturing provides some of the higher paying jobs in rural counties.
 
Jobs Generally Pay Well and Do Not Require High Levels of Education
 
The top 20 occupations in wood product manufacturing tend to pay well, with average annual wages of $30,000 or more. Eighty-five percent of the top 20 occupations require a high school diploma or less. Only general operations managers and industrial production managers typically require a college degree. Some of the more technical occupations like industrial machinery mechanics and electricians have average annual wages of more than $50,000 and require only a high school diploma, providing opportunity for those who don’t get a college degree.
 
Forecast
 
Employment projections from the Oregon Employment Department show that wood product manufacturing employment growth is expected to slow, adding only 100 new jobs between 2017 and 2027. Demand for wood products is expected to slow along with the overall economy and housing market.
 
Like many industries, wood product manufacturing has an aging workforce reaching retirement age. This creates additional demand for workers through replacement needs. In addition to the 100 new jobs that the industry is expected to create between 2017 and 2027, there are expected to be roughly 9,600 openings from people leaving the industry, largely due to retirements.

Author Brian Rooney is a regional economist for the State of Oregon Employment Department.

 

Have something to say? Share your thoughts with us in the comments below.