Steves and Sons reports Jeld-Wen enjoined from re-trying lawsuit
August 20, 2019 | 10:09 am CDT

SAN ANTONIO – Texas door manufacturer Steves and Sons said in a statement that a Federal judge in Virginia enjoined Jeld-Wen from relitigating the same claims in a San Antonio state district court that had been previously tried in Federal court in Virginia.

In a 36-page opinion, Judge Robert E. Payne of the Federal court for the Eastern District of Virginia issued a permanent injunction ending Jeld-Wen’s attempt to try a virtually identical lawsuit in Texas that had already been tried in his Richmond, Virginia, court in which the jury, on May 11, 2018, rejected almost all of Jeld-Wen’s core allegations that Steves had misappropriated purported trade secrets.  

In his opinion reported by Steves, Judge Payne stated, “Jeld-Wen’s efforts to explain why the claims…are different in the Texas case is unconvincing.” He wrote further, “Jeld-Wen already had an opportunity to litigate its claims in the Virginia Action, and it merely wants a second bite at the apple.”  

Steves attorney Marvin G. Pipkin said, “The judge had it absolutely correct in his opinion. Jeld-Wen was simply looking for a do-over and that was clear from their actions. Judge Payne rightly put an end to that effort.”

In a lawsuit, Steves had previously won a unanimous February 15, 2018 jury decision in Richmond agreeing with Steves’ assertion that Jeld-Wen violated federal antitrust law, specifically, the Clayton Act, by substantially reducing competition in the market for interior molded doorskins in the United States through its acquisition of its former competitor, CMI (which owned a Towanda, Pennsylvania, doorskin manufacturing plant).  The jury also sided with Steves in finding that Jeld-Wen had breached its long-term doorskin supply agreement with Steves.  The jury awarded Steves $58 million in past damages and lost profits, which the Virginia judge trebled to total $174 million.

Doorskins are a vital component for door manufacturing, which is Steves and Sons prime business.

Subsequent to that February, 2018 jury decision in Steves’ favor, Judge Payne ruled that Jeld-Wen must divest itself of the Towanda plant in order to restore competition in the marketplace.  The case is now on appeal in the United States 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia.

Judge Payne has further ruled that, if the case remains on appeal on September 10, 2021,the date that their agreement is set to expire, Jeld-Wen must extend its supply agreement with Steves for at least one year beyond the conclusion of the appeal. See

Have something to say? Share your thoughts with us in the comments below.

Profile picture for user karlforth
About the author
Karl Forth

Karl D. Forth is online editor for CCI Media. He also writes news and feature stories in FDMC Magazine, in addition to newsletters and custom publishing projects. He is also involved in event organization, and compiles the annual FDM 300 list of industry leaders. He can be reached at