Q: We have an RF gluer. As you know, when we have a wet piece of wood, we tend to get some arcing and smoking, which of course, ruins current production and takes time to get back into production. So, we see two options: First, run the kilns longer to avoid wet lumber or, second, use an in-line moisture meter to eliminate the wet pieces (maybe 1 to 3 percent of a load might be wet) and then refrying these wet pieces when we collect enough for a kiln load. What do you think?

A: Obviously, you have done some studying and also know yourequipment. So, without any background info, I will give you my thoughts.

The first approach is a good solution if you are drying differentspecies or thicknesses. It may take an extra day or two in the kiln to get thecorrect final MC and eliminate the wet pieces. As a rough rule of thumb, Isuggest that a kiln has an operating cost of $10 to $15 per day per MBF. So,two extra days in the kiln increases the cost of the incoming lumber by about$25 per MBF. In a 50 MBF kiln, that is $1250. This approach does worktechnically, but it can be expensive. (Rather than running the kiln an extraday or two, we might also address the cause of MC variation, which is oftenuneven air drying prior to kiln drying. So, money spent in the air yard to geta uniform MC for lumber going into the kiln can have a big impact on costs andgluing production too.)


The second approach is very effective when the incoming rawmaterial is the same from hour to hour and day to day. Stated another way, thesecond approach will not work well (money-wise) when there are variations inraw material (other than moisture variations). I have had several clientsinstall in-line meters to identify wet lumber (and even give clues as to whichkiln and what history may be encouraging the wide range of MC). One clientreduced the end splitting problem in the wintertime to well under 1 percent afterthey pulled out the wet pieces from production. Although each operation willhave different numbers, several clients have found that rejecting 1 to 3percent of the pieces due to high MC is more cost effective than running thekilns for several extra days.


I had a client making kitchen cabinets and they were able toreduce their rejects in the wintertime to under 4 percent by pulling the wetterpieces and then holding them in storage until the summertime.


As a final comment, even with the first approach, an on-linemeter will help in identifying the incoming MC, the variations in MC andpotentially the causes of such undesired variations or high MCs so that changescan be made to improve overall processing. If you cannot afford to measure theMC of every piece with an in-line meter, there are valid ways to estimate theaverage MC and the variation using a handheld meter and specific samplingtechniques (such as 6-Sigma, SPC, and TQM). Your local community college orCooperative Extension Small Business office often can provide on-the-groundassistance. 

Have something to say? Share your thoughts with us in the comments below.