Conestoga Wood To Get Supreme Court Healthcare Hearing

By Bill Esler | Posted: 11/26/2013 3:47PM


Conestoga Wood Speicalties Anthony Hahn WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review a lower court ruling that requires the 900-employee Conestoga Wood Specialties components business to fund certain types of birth control under its group health insurance program.

Anthony Hahn, president and CEO of Conestoga Wood Specialties, says the requirement violates his Mennonite religious convictions. Anthony Hahn is the second generation of Hahn's to control the family business. Under the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, group insurance policies must cover contraception services.

Conestoga Asks Supreme Court for Hearing on Obamacare

Video: Conestoga Wood CEO Anthony Hahn on Healthcare Lawsuit

Conestoga Lawyers Appeal to Supreme Court

Conestoga Wood Sues Feds Over Health Care Act

Conestoga Wood Specialties - Conestoga's Door to Success

Conestoga Wood Specialties Handles 150,000 Online Orders

In December 2012 the Hahns filed a civil lawsuit in Federal Court in Philadelphia against three U.S. government agencies. They sought an injunction over the Affordable Care Act requirement for insurance coverage for morning-after birth control pills and sterilization, which the Hahns say run counter to Mennonite beliefs.

Conestoga Wood Specialities corporation was also part to the case. The original claim states that for Conestoga, it would be "sinful and immoral for the company to participate in, pay for, facilitate or otherwise support contraception" that would have the same effect as an abortion.

The Hahns lost the original case, then appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, losing again on July 26 when the court upheld the lower court's denial of a preliminary injunction. Analysts say the case turns on whether a for-profit corporation can have a religious belief, as opposed to an individual or a religious institution.

The petition filed with the Supreme Court argues that “the Hahn family and their close identification with Conestoga exemplify the case for allowing for-profit businesses and their family owners to live their faith as they participate in the marketplace."

Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys, which has been handling the case - along with 12 other related cases -  is now seeking funding at its site for Conestoga Wood Specialties Supreme Court appeal. The Washington-based organization provides pro-bono legal aid to Christian groups, and provides legal support in court cases related to conservative Christian religious issues, such as same-sex marriage and federal aid to private religious schools.

Conestoga Wood Specialties must pay nearly $3 million per month in fines, enforced by the Internal Revenue Service, if it doesn’t allow insurance coverage for contraception.


About the Author

Bill Esler, Woodworking Network, WMS

Bill Esler

Bill Esler, Editorial Director, Woodworking Network Bill is responsible for overall content at Woodworking Network magazine, and related newsletters. Bill also manages event programs for Woodworking Network Live conferences at the Woodworking Machinery & Supplies Expo in Toronto and Cabinets & Closets Expo. He developing audience engagement programs using custom digital printing, live lead-generating events, custom websites, and custom digital and print content. Read Bill Esler's woodworking blogs. He can be reached at or follow him on Google+.

Comments (3) Leave a comment 

e-Mail (required)


characters left

Illinois  |  November, 27, 2013 at 10:18 AM

An employer being required to provide anything (especially something as mainstream as contraception) for someone to use at there option is not discrimination against the employer. Requiring an employee to constrained to your religious beliefs is not fair or constitutional. If their company was a church and not a commercial endeavor, I would support their right to hire only those who adhere to that religion.

Florida  |  November, 27, 2013 at 10:42 AM

Rick, they're not requiring an employee to do anything. It is the Employer who is being compelled to provide something that is counter to their beliefs. Agree, disagree, mainstream or not, the constitution demands we respect their religious choice. How is it a Wood Door and Component company responsible for an employee's morning after pill? This sounds like the role of government to you? Wow!

Michael Wilson    
Columbus, IN  |  November, 27, 2013 at 11:20 AM

It runs counter to their beliefs but taking money and making a profit from people that don't share those beliefs isn't a problem for them? They don't qualify for not-for-profit and the SCOTUS will give the same ruling they received in a lower court. It's a waste of time and money, and above everything a distraction for our legislatures and keeping them from other more important taskes at hand. The company I work for has been a buyer from Conestoga and this does not sit well.


Search our database for woodworking equipment, supplies and services:

Select a category:

Feedback Form
Feedback Form